When the Body Remembers: Rethinking Trauma Beyond Words

IJNGP team 12th August, 2025.

"Trauma is not what happens to us, but what we hold inside in the absence of an empathetic witness" - Peter Levine

You’ve probably seen it, not just in therapy but in the small moments we share with people every day. A friend jumps when a door slams, as if something from the past has reached out and touched them before the present could catch them. A client talks in a calm, steady voice, but under the table their fingers tap out a pattern that feels like it belongs to another chapter of their life, a time when feeling safe wasn’t a given. A colleague, known for their stamina, goes through the day as if every breath has to be measured, like an invisible hand is on their chest deciding how much they can let go. These aren’t just habits. They’re traces of memory, still living in the body, in the way someone breathes, in the set of their shoulders, in the rhythm of their movements, what is described as body memory, the way past experiences are carried forward through posture, sensation, and movement patterns that often speak before words do, like a faint scent that suddenly pulls you back to another room, or a song whose first note stirs an entire season of your life without warning (Koch, Fuchs, Summa, & Müller, 2012). And just like those memories that show up without warning, trauma can slip in quietly too. 

We often give it a name, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) because having a label makes it easier to list what we see, flashbacks, hypervigilance, avoidance. But trauma rarely stays inside those lines. It can touch almost every part of the body, increasing the risk of autoimmune disease, heart problems, and metabolic changes (Yehuda et al., 2015; Pacella et al., 2013; Bowers et al., 2025; Singh et al., 2025; Garcia-López et al., 2024). It’s less like a single wound and more like dye dropped into water, spreading through every system, changing the way the whole body moves, rests, and repairs itself over time. For Elias, that dye had seeped in slowly, until being on high alert felt like his natural state. He came to therapy because something in him was always switched on. He described it as a constant urge to move, to do, to act on something, anything. From the outside, he looked like he had things under control, running his business, spending time with his family, meeting friends when he could. But inside, it felt different. His body was running a race he’d never agreed to start. His shoulders stayed tight and lifted, as if invisible strings were pulling them upward. Nights brought no relief, only a pounding heart and sudden waves of heat that jolted him awake, leaving him staring at the ceiling in the dark. One afternoon in session, he leaned back and pressed his palm against his chest. “It’s like there’s this thud in here,” he said quietly, “too hard, too fast, like it’s ready to bolt before I’ve even moved.” He fell silent, his brows tightening, a sheen of sweat forming on his forehead. When he spoke again, his voice was softer. “I’m in my room… it’s dark. I can hear them downstairs, my parents, shouting, breaking things, yelling at each other. My chest feels the same. I’m lying still, holding my breath, waiting for it to stop or for someone to come up the stairs.” His hand stayed over his chest, as if he were still that boy, waiting for someone to find him.

His doctors had treated the heart palpitations as if they were a problem on their own. But in therapy, it became clear the rhythm in his chest wasn’t random at all, it was a memory his body had been carrying, steady and insistent, shaping how he moved through every part of his day. You could see it in the small, stubborn details, the way his shoulders stayed slightly lifted, as if bracing for something, in the dull ache beneath his ribs that no scan could name. These moments didn’t step forward and announce themselves as trauma. They had been arriving quietly for years, threading themselves through his life since the nights he lay in bed as a boy, the air thick with the sense that something could happen at any moment. The stillness of the room did nothing to soften the tension in his chest. Even in the dark, his body learned to stay alert, storing the feeling as if it might be needed again, an unseen companion, shaping how he moved, how he breathed, how he felt the world around him. And when words still wouldn’t come, the body spoke through sensation, through posture, through rhythms that had been telling the story all along. 

A stomach that tightens for no clear reason, a back that aches long after rest, these aren’t just odd, passing quirks. They can be signs of memory stored in the body’s tissue. Even without words, these experiences can shape how a person reacts, makes choices, and stays well over time (Kühner et al., 2022). Research has traced some of these patterns to the brainstem, the body’s early warning system, where trauma can take hold before the thinking mind is even involved (Manjón-Luengo et al., 2022). Think of the body as a kind of archive. Not like a static library, but a living, breathing memory system, one that encodes threat, shame, and shock into muscle tone, hormonal rhythms, and startle responses. Traumatic experiences are stored as implicit, embodied memories that bypass conscious narrative and shape the bodily self at a fundamental level (Kearney et al., 2023). It’s not that the trauma has returned, it never left. What hasn’t yet found words often surfaces as sensation, a tight chest, averted gaze, or the subtle retreat of the shoulders. A person may say, “I’m fine,” with practiced ease, while their body, almost imperceptibly, leans away, curls inward, or braces against a threat long past but still present in their physiology. 

That gap between spoken word and bodily expression isn’t a contradiction, it is a reflection of embodiment, the idea that our thoughts, emotions, and language are grounded in sensory and motor experiences that shape how we perceive and respond to the world (Barsalou, 2008; Varela et al., 1991). The body serves as a living testimony, carrying not excess or resistance, but fidelity to an experience that has not yet completed its passage through awareness. When language remains out of reach, the body steps in as its primary mode of communication. This is where the concept of embodied cognition becomes essential, not as theory, but as clinical reality. Memory, perception, and emotional meaning are all shaped through sensorimotor processes that evolve alongside cognitive development. When trauma interrupts these processes, it often manifests through chronic pain, fragmentation, or dissociative states, signaling unresolved disruptions in the body’s lived coherence (Nijenhuis, E. R. S.  2024). The perceptual experience of inhabiting one's body plays a critical role in how memories are encoded and retrieved. When the sense of body-ownership is heightened, even through controlled illusion, memory recall becomes more vivid and accurate (Iriye & Ehrsson, 2021). This suggests that our felt sense of embodiment isn’t peripheral to remembering; it is foundational. Memory reactivates through the physical self, and it is this somatic presence that allows the past to be meaningfully relieved. The mind grows within it. Our thoughts and behaviors are shaped by our physical experience of the world. If someone has spent years in a body braced for danger, their cognition adapts accordingly, threat detection sharpens, trust contracts, imagination narrows. The body doesn’t just carry memory, it shapes reality (Gallese & Lakoff, 2005). 

The mind doesn’t hover above the body like a separate instrument, it grows from within it, shaped by breath, posture, tension, and touch. Our thoughts, habits, and reflexes are deeply rooted in how the body has learned to survive. When someone has lived for years in a body braced for danger, their entire way of perceiving the world begins to shift. Trust becomes cautious, imagination pulls inward, and attention sharpens toward anything that might signal threat. Individuals with PTSD consistently show a heightened attentional bias toward threat, with their cognitive systems recalibrated to prioritize danger detection over other kinds of input (Fragkaki, Thomaes, & Engelhard, 2016). In this light, the body doesn't merely carry memory; it shapes the very reality a person comes to expect. Trauma reshapes bodily organization taking control over the body basic functioning of the fight, flight and freeze. The forthcoming section undertakes a detailed examination of the body’s lexicon, cardiac variability, sustained myofascial tension, nuanced interoceptive signaling, and subtle olfactory cues. It delineates how the autonomic nervous system, procedural muscular memory, interoceptive pathways, and olfactory circuits each convey distinct phenomenological information that precedes explicit linguistic formulation. Mapping these somatic channels clarifies new avenues for clinical attunement and delineates a trajectory of healing that emerges precisely at the juncture where verbal discourse subsides.

Figure 1:  Autonomic nervous system states per Dr. Stephen Porges’ Polyvagal Theory. From “Autonomic Nervous System States” by Polyvagal Institute, 2023 (https://www.polyvagalinstitute.org). Copyright 2023 by Polyvagal

Decoding Trauma’s Hidden Dialogues Across Physiology and Perception

Elena had spent years in a city where the night air carried the sound of sirens more often than songbirds. War didn’t always reach her doorstep, but it was never far away, sometimes a deep rumble rolling in from the distance, other times in the way people’s eyes flicked toward the horizon, scanning without even realising it. Most nights, she moved under the harsh glow of fluorescent lights, her body learning to live in the rhythm of urgency. Even when dawn came and the streets were quiet, adrenaline still pulsed through her veins, as if the night’s tension had followed her into the morning. Over time, the sense of danger settled into more than just her muscles and breath, it began shaping how she saw the world. The sound of an engine idling too long, the flicker of a shadow, even a shift in the air could tip her attention toward threat. She wasn’t just carrying the war in her body; she was carrying it in her perception, her nervous system treating the present moment as though it were a continuation of the past.

In therapy, this showed up in the smallest, almost invisible ways. One afternoon, she tried to take a deep breath. It should have travelled easily into her belly, but it stopped short, caught high in her chest as if it had hit an invisible wall. Her diaphragm was clenched tight, like a fist waiting for a blow. Her jaw locked, her pelvis gripped the chair, beads of sweat appeared along her hairline. Her fingers curled slightly against her legs, as if holding herself in place while the rest of her braced for something unseen. The air in the room grew heavy, still, like the pause before a storm. When the exhale finally came, her shoulders shook, and she caught it, a faint whiff of burning rubber. The scent hit her like a jolt, sharp and immediate, carrying her back to a night years before: a crash during an evacuation, the streets thick with smoke, the air vibrating with fear. Her body had kept that memory locked away, waiting for the day it was safe enough to let it rise to the surface. She told what it was like to live with that constant readiness, as if she were floating half a metre outside herself, her heartbeat and the quiet signals from her gut muffled behind glass. She had taught herself to survive by scanning for danger and silencing what she felt inside. But in doing so, she had lost touch with the body’s voice, the one that could tell her when she was safe.

In people with trauma, years of living with threat had kept their nervous system on constant alert, a state often visible in reduced heart-rate variability and patterns of hyperarousal that linger well beyond the end of danger (Shaffer & Ginsberg, 2017). This kind of state doesn’t just fade when the noise stops or the streets clear. It trains the body to expect interruption, the mind to watch for the first tremor in the air. You see it in the way someone stands with their back to a wall in public, or how they measure the distance to an exit without realising they are doing it. It changes not only physiology but perception, pulling attention toward anything that even faintly resembles a threat (Thayer & Lane, 2009). For Elena, the sound of an engine idling could freeze her mid-step, the smell of overheated tyres could narrow her field of vision, the shadow of someone moving too quickly could make her breath hitch. In people like her, where the body feels stuck in the moment of impact, there can be what feels like a split, the body caught in a posture of defence while the psyche hovers outside the scene, still circling the point where everything changed. Time doesn’t flow evenly; one part of you continues forward into the ordinary rhythm of days, while another is pulled back, again and again, to the unfinished second before the blow.

The body learns to guard itself through constant muscle bracing, a state called myofascial vigilance, which over years can feed into chronic pain, tension headaches, and higher blood pressure (Arendt-Nielsen et al., 2013; Gerra et al., 2008). You might notice it in the shoulders that never release, the jaw that works silently through the night, or the spine that stiffens at the sound of footsteps approaching from behind. These patterns are not simply habits; they are the body’s way of keeping watch, a constant state of defence. And memories like in her case, the sudden intrusion of burning rubber, are rarely without meaning. Trauma can live in sensory and motor pathways, returning first through smell, sound, or sensation before a single word forms (van der Kolk, 2014; Price & Hooven, 2018). It’s a kind of remembering that doesn’t ask for permission, arriving in the middle of a conversation or while standing at a market stall. One second you are in the present, the next you are somewhere else entirely, your body carrying you to a place your mind would rather avoid. 

Early stress can even thin the pathways between the insula, which helps us sense our body, and the cingulate, which helps us give meaning to emotion, making it easier to drift into dissociation and harder to trust the messages coming from within (Schulz & Vögele, 2015; Koch et al., 2022). Without that trust, hunger can feel like unease, fatigue like failure, safety like something you can’t quite believe. This is why slow, steady work matters. Paced breathing, scanning from the crown of the head to the soles of the feet, and reintroducing safe sensory cues can slowly restore the dialogue between body and mind. Over time, those signals begin to take shape again, becoming reliable guides for action and rest (Farb et al., 2015; Khalsa et al., 2018). Even long-entrenched threat responses, like Elena’s spike in pulse at the scent of diesel fumes, can shift when those triggers are repeatedly paired with safety, familiarity, or care (Daniels et al., 2021; Herz, 2016; Pollatos & Schandry, 2020). Change may be gradual, almost imperceptible at first, but with repetition, the nervous system starts to believe what the present has been trying to say all along, that it is safe enough to stay.

Somatic Turn in Trauma Therapy

"In bottom‑up approaches to processing trauma, the body’s sensation and movement are the entry points, and changes in sensorimotor experience support self‑regulation, memory processing, and success in daily life. Meaning and understanding emerge from new experiences, rather than the other way around."

- Pat Ogden

Before reaching for the first tool, it’s worth pausing to wonder which way real change prefers to move. Do we shape the current, or does the current shape us, carrying us somewhere we might not have reached by effort alone? What if the way we’ve been approaching trauma recovery has been turned the wrong way round? More and more, clinical work hints that healing often gathers momentum when it begins in the body, through sensation, breath, and movement, and only then rises toward thought. It’s less a matter of fixing the mind so the body will follow, and more about letting the body’s quiet language lead the way. This is a rethinking of what transformation means once the dust of trauma begins to settle.

Traditional methods engage the mind’s planning centres with skill, exposure hierarchies that carefully reduce fear, reframing beliefs that no longer fit, or the dual-attention of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) to untangle disturbing memories. These approaches speak to the cortex in the language it knows, logic, sequence, meaning. But trauma’s roots are often deeper, in the brainstem, limbic system, and insular regions, closer to breath than to thought, and these can remain untouched by words alone (Fisher, 2021). When we start where vigilance lives, in the depth of the inhale, in the set of the jaw, in the micro-adjustments of balance, in the steady or stuttering rhythm of a pulse, we meet trauma in its native ground. From here, we can grow the neural soil that supports lasting integration. Research backs this shift: systematic reviews show medium-to-large effect sizes when Body- and Movement-Oriented Interventions (BMOIs) form the backbone of treatment (Taylor et al., 2019).

Hopper et al. (2019) used neuroimaging to show that somatic approaches reach the brain’s most disrupted areas after trauma, the insula, anterior cingulate, and prefrontal cortex, in ways talk therapy often cannot. Their work suggests that embodied methods do more than soothe; they rewire the circuits responsible for self-awareness and emotional regulation. In this way, they rebuild what Porges (2011) calls the “neuroception” system, the unconscious safety radar that works before thought has time to form. Payne et al. (2015) found similar results in their meta-analyses of dance and movement therapy, showing significant improvements not only in PTSD symptoms but also in quality of life and bodily awareness. It’s a reminder that healing through the body isn’t just about reducing distress, it restores capacities for connection and vitality that trauma scatters. When the body stays locked in defensive patterns despite the mind’s awareness of safety, it’s the autonomic nervous system overriding conscious intention. Polyvagal-informed therapy, as described by Dana (2018), works directly with these systems of breath, sensation, and movement to restore co-regulation, the nervous system’s ability to use relationship as a stabilising force. This is what some now call somatic literacy, becoming fluent in the body’s own vocabulary. Practices like mindful diaphragmatic pacing, subtle weight-shifts, and safe sensory cues draw attention to changes in temperature, tension, and motion. Farb et al. (2015) showed that repeated practice strengthens the brain’s insula-anterior-cingulate link, helping bodily signals re-enter emotional awareness with more precision. Koch and Fuchs (2011) went further, showing that such awareness can rebuild the sense of bodily ownership that trauma often fractures.

Gendlin (1978) called this process “felt sensing”, tuning into the body’s subtle signals about emotional and psychological states. Neuroscience now supports his view, showing that this sense emerges from the integration of interoceptive signals with emotion-processing networks. When trauma interrupts that link, people can feel cut off from their own bodies or flooded by sensations they can’t interpret. Somatic sessions often move from guided noticing to small “experiments”: shifting the angle of the sternum, pressing feet into the floor, exploring how posture shapes memory. In these moments, the body acts as both stage and storyteller, completing survival responses that were frozen in time (Levine & Frederick, 1997). The relational space adds another dimension. Gallese (2020) showed that therapists’ regulated breathing or grounded posture offers clients a live somatic model that the brain absorbs through resonance and motor simulation. Schore (2019) describes how such attunement builds the capacity for self-regulation over time. Tronick’s (2007) work on “interactive repair” shows that when therapists respond accurately to micro-expressions, breath patterns, and posture shifts, they help reorganise the nervous system around safety rather than threat. This is where trust in the body’s signals, often eroded by trauma, can begin to return. 

Another frontier involves interoceptive beliefs, the unconscious conviction that bodily signals are unreliable or dangerous. Khalsa and Lapidus (2016) developed ways to blend imaginary exposure to inner sensations with reframing, helping clients test the safety of a racing heart or tight stomach. Price et al. (2021) found that shifting these beliefs improves emotional labelling and reduces dissociation. Dunn et al. (2010) showed that accuracy in sensing bodily signals directly links to emotional regulation and overall wellbeing.

Somatic approaches increasingly combine multiple methods to match trauma’s complexity. Ogden and Fisher (2015) describe integrated processing, drawing on cognitive, mindfulness, and body-based tools together. Courtois and Ford (2016) emphasise “phase-oriented” work, starting with stabilisation and resource building before processing trauma itself. The MAIA scale (Mehling et al., 2018) helps track these changes, measuring eight aspects of body awareness, while biomarkers like Heart Rate Variability (HRV) give a physiological read on progress (Thayer & Lane, 2009). What emerges from this is not just symptom relief, but a multichannel scaffold for integration, one that honours both the body’s wisdom and the mind’s meaning-making. In this space, sensation, feeling, thought, and action begin to work together again. It also blurs the lines between psychotherapy and physical health, with somatic methods appearing in pain clinics, cardiac rehab, and oncology care. And it opens the door to prevention, teaching children interoceptive skills, embedding movement practices that build nervous system resilience, and creating community spaces where embodied connection is part of everyday life.

In that view, the body is no longer rehearsing unfinished alarms or carrying armour against threats long gone. It begins to stand in the present as an active participant in life, anchored in breath, steady in posture, and open to new stories. Stories written in the quiet memory of tissues that have relearned, at last, the art of trust.  And perhaps this is the deeper work of recovery, not to erase what has happened, but to live so fully in one’s own skin that each step, each breath, quietly declares a presence that is here now, whole enough to meet whatever comes next.

References 

• Ahmed, R., Chen, L., & Martinez, J. M. (2024). Inflammatory signatures of post‑traumatic stress: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of cytokine profiles. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 154, 106157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.106157

• American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.).

• Arendt‑Nielsen, L., Andersen, O. K., & Graven‑Nielsen, T. (2013). Muscle pain, From pharmacological studies to clinical assessment. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 17(6), 356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-013-0356-8

• Bowers, K., Adler, N., & Sivakumar, P. (2025). Autoimmune disease risk following psychological trauma: Meta‑analysis of population‑based studies. Autoimmunity Reviews, 24(2), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103157

• Courtois, C. A., & Ford, J. D. (2016). Treatment of complex trauma: A sequenced, relationship‑based approach. Guilford Press.

• Dana, D. A. (2018). The polyvagal theory in therapy: Engaging the rhythm of regulation. W. W. Norton.

• Daniels, J. K., Vermetten, E., & Lanius, R. A. (2021). Olfactory triggers and autonomic hyperreactivity in trauma survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 34(3), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22662

• Dunn, B. D., Galton, H. C., Morgan, R., et al. (2010). Listening to your heart: How interoception shapes emotion experience and intuitive decision making. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1835–1844. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610389191

• Farb, N. A., Irving, J., Anderson, A. K., & Segal, Z. V. (2015). Mindfulness training and interoceptive awareness. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(12), 1979–1987. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu070

• Fisher, J. (2021). Sensorimotor psychotherapy in context: Defining trauma‑informed somatic practice. Routledge.

• Fragkaki, I., Thomaes, K., & Engelhard, I. M. (2016). A meta‑analysis of the association between attentional bias and post‑traumatic stress. Clinical Psychology Review, 47, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.05.001

• Garcia‑López, R., Patel, S., & O’Connor, C. M. (2024). Post‑traumatic stress burden and five‑year heart‑failure hospitalization: Findings from the CARDIA cohort. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 83(7), 612–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.11.018

• Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory‑motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310

• Gendlin, E. T. (1978). Focusing. Bantam.

• Gerra, G., Zaimovic, A., Giusti, F., & Brambilla, F. (2008). Neuroendocrine correlates of stress in subjects with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Stress and Health, 24(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1169

• Herz, R. S. (2016). The role of odor‑evoked memory in psychological and physiological health. Brain Sciences, 6(3), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci6030022

• Hopper, J. W., Spinazzola, J., Simpson, W. B., & van der Kolk, B. A. (2019). Neural correlates of somatic therapy for trauma: A pilot fMRI study. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 288, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2019.05.008

• Iriye, H., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2021). Enhanced autobiographical memory following illusory body ownership. Neuropsychologia, 160, 107995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107995

• Kearney, D. J., McDermott, K., & Malte, C. (2023). Implicit bodily memory and post‑traumatic adaptation: A review of emerging evidence. Traumatology, 29(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000386

• Khalsa, S. S., & Lapidus, R. C. (2016). Can interoception improve the pragmatic search for biomarkers in psychiatry? Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7, 121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00121

• Khalsa, S. S., Rudrauf, D., & Tranel, D. (2018). Interoceptive training enhances insula‑mediated heart‑beat differentiation. Psychophysiology, 55(4), e13012. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13012

• Koch, S. C., & Fuchs, T. (2011). Embodied arts therapies. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 38(4), 276–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2011.09.001

• Koch, S. B. J., van Zuiden, M., Nawijn, L., et al. (2022). Body dissociation mediates the link between childhood trauma and emotion dysregulation. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 13(1), 2057835. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2022.2057835

• Kühner, C., Braun, J., & Dietrich, C. (2022). Chronic somatic pain as embodied mnemonic trace: Integrative evidence from neuroimaging and psychophysiology. Pain Reports, 7(5), e1049. https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001049

• Levine, P. A. (2010). In an unspoken voice: How the body releases trauma and restores goodness. North Atlantic Books.

• Manjón‑Luengo, J., Delgado‑García, J. M., & Núñez, A. (2022). Brainstem autonomic nuclei as convergent nodes in post‑traumatic dysregulation: A functional MRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 43(14), 4245–4259. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25927

• Mehling, W. E., Daubenmier, J., Price, C. J., et al. (2018). The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). PLoS ONE, 13(11), e0208034. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208034

• Mehling, W. E., Wrubel, J., & Daubenmier, J. (2022). Somatic interventions reduce PTSD and pain symptoms. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 31, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.04.005

• Nijenhuis, E. R. S. (2024). The embodied self in trauma and dissociation (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

• Ogden, P., & Fisher, J. (2015). Sensorimotor psychotherapy: Interventions for trauma and attachment. W. W. Norton.

• Pacella, M. L., Hruska, B., & Delahanty, D. L. (2013). The physical health consequences of PTSD and PTSD symptoms: A meta‑analytic review. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 27(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.08.004

• Payne, H., Levine, B., & Crane‑Godreau, M. (2015). Somatic movement therapy for trauma recovery: Meta‑analytic findings. Traumatology, 21(2), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000031

• Pollatos, O., & Schandry, R. (2020). Olfactory acceleration of threat detection in maltreatment survivors. Chemical Senses, 45(5), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjaa024

• Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self‑regulation. W. W. Norton.

• Price, C. J., & Hooven, C. (2018). Interoceptive awareness skills for emotion regulation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(5), 903–916. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22616

• Price, C. J., Wells, E., Donovan, D. M., & Rue, T. (2021). Interoceptive exposure and cognitive reframing reduce dissociation in trauma survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 34(4), 824–835. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22661

• Schore, A. N. (2019). Right‑brain psychotherapy. W. W. Norton.

• Shaffer, F., & Ginsberg, J. P. (2017). An overview of heart‑rate‑variability metrics and norms. Frontiers in Public Health, 5, 258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258

• Singh, R., Molina, C., & Hartley, C. A. (2025). Metabolic syndrome trajectories following post‑traumatic stress. Translational Psychiatry, 15, 34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398‑024‑02880‑5

• Taylor, L. F., Hristova, S., & Jovanović, T. (2019). Body‑ and movement‑oriented interventions for PTSD: A systematic review and meta‑analysis. European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 3(4), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejtd.2019.04.003

• Thayer, J. F., & Lane, R. D. (2009). Claude Bernard and the heart‑brain connection: The model of neurovisceral integration. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.004

• Tronick, E. Z. (2007). The neurobehavioral and social‑emotional development of infants and children. W. W. Norton.

• van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Penguin.

• Van der Kolk, B. A., & Suppes, T. (2020). Alpha‑wave restoration and autonomic flexibility following somatic therapy. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 51(4), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550059419892093

• Yehuda, R., Paullada, A., & McFarlane, A. (2015). Impaired glucocorticoid feedback in PTSD: The endocrine legacy of trauma. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 51, 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.10.015

• Zhao, X., Mumford, J. A., & Abdallah, C. G. (2024). Gut microbiome alterations in post‑traumatic stress disorder: A meta‑analytic synthesis. Brain, Behavior, & Immunity, 118, 404–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2024.02.012